<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comicology Podcast: issue #24</title>
	<link>http://comicology.net/comicology-podcast-issue-24/</link>
	<description>Dispatches from the world of digital comics</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 07:56:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael Craven</title>
		<link>http://comicology.net/comicology-podcast-issue-24/#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Craven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2005 13:34:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://comicology.net/comicology-podcast-issue-24/#comment-50</guid>
		<description>Hey Neil-

Mur Lafferty mentions this is in her podcast today and it is something I have been thinking about too, so I mention it.  The art of Ex Machina is precise and technically great.  But, don't you think that it is a little - wrong?  Mur has no better luck than I do putting her finger on the problem.  I think that it is linked to all of the photo references the artists uses.  The poses are stilted.  It reminds me of how creepy animation that tries to copy real life is, as oposed to the wonderful 'Incredibles', which is what it is, a cartoon.  I feel like Ex Machina tries to push realism to the point where it doesn't serve the medium anymore.  I have similar problems with some of Alex Ross' work.  Anyway, I am blathering.  Great show.  

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Neil-</p>
<p>Mur Lafferty mentions this is in her podcast today and it is something I have been thinking about too, so I mention it.  The art of Ex Machina is precise and technically great.  But, don&#8217;t you think that it is a little - wrong?  Mur has no better luck than I do putting her finger on the problem.  I think that it is linked to all of the photo references the artists uses.  The poses are stilted.  It reminds me of how creepy animation that tries to copy real life is, as oposed to the wonderful &#8216;Incredibles&#8217;, which is what it is, a cartoon.  I feel like Ex Machina tries to push realism to the point where it doesn&#8217;t serve the medium anymore.  I have similar problems with some of Alex Ross&#8217; work.  Anyway, I am blathering.  Great show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://comicology.net/comicology-podcast-issue-24/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2005 04:09:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://comicology.net/comicology-podcast-issue-24/#comment-49</guid>
		<description>The link is fixed now, thanks LOTS for the heads up on that. 

-N</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The link is fixed now, thanks LOTS for the heads up on that. </p>
<p>-N</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristin</title>
		<link>http://comicology.net/comicology-podcast-issue-24/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2005 00:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://comicology.net/comicology-podcast-issue-24/#comment-48</guid>
		<description>The link to this show seems to be broken.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The link to this show seems to be broken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
